Any settlement is then produced as a document which the court docket, if happy, makes right into a court docket order confirming the phrases of settlement.

In the paper, I argue that that view is inaccurate, and will be proven to be so by reference to the latest jurisprudence of the UK Supreme Court docket — together with, paradoxically, cases by which Lord Neuberger performed an instrumental position.  This implies, amongst different issues, that people can take human rights instances in home courts